Hi
Did anyone run the Coremark benchmark on MilkV Duo and Duo256M ?
1 Like
I did.
In 64M:
[root@milkv-duo]~# coremark
2K performance run parameters for coremark.
CoreMark Size : 666
Total ticks : 12782
Total time (secs): 12.782000
Iterations/Sec : 2347.050540
Iterations : 30000
Compiler version : GCC10.2.0
Compiler flags : -O2 -lrt
Memory location : Please put data memory location here
(e.g. code in flash, data on heap etc)
seedcrc : 0xe9f5
[0]crclist : 0xe714
[0]crcmatrix : 0x1fd7
[0]crcstate : 0x8e3a
[0]crcfinal : 0x5275
Correct operation validated. See readme.txt for run and reporting rules.
CoreMark 1.0 : 2347.050540 / GCC10.2.0 -O2 -lrt / Heap
[root@milkv-duo]~#
In 256M, I forgot to take a screenshot, but I remember that around 2600CM.
The result is near by Raspberry pi 1.
2 Likes
Thanks foryour answer. Do you know if there is a comparison for various HW similar to the MilkV available somewhere?
1 Like
It’s Luckfox Pico, A similar hardware to the Duo that onboard RV1103(Cortex-A7) with 64MB of RAM.
In the coremark benchmark, the Luckfox pico shows a value about 1000 higher than the Duo.
However, the Duo 256M has 256MB of RAM. That is a clear advantage against the Luckfox Pico.